mirror of
https://github.com/web3privacy/explorer.git
synced 2024-10-15 19:06:26 +02:00
78 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
78 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
|
|
|
|
|
|
**8 march, spaceship Earth**
|
|
- Created a table with 50+ privacy-services recommendations from Sismo to Privacy&Scalability explorations for non-techies assesment [Link](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JWpAsGL10UTsVeuIVbouzUxRjaSPUAamxcbFljXuUWE/edit?usp=sharing)
|
|
- Created a concept that assumes that not every techie could "read&understand" the tech side like code equally (junior dev vs CTO) [Link](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JWpAsGL10UTsVeuIVbouzUxRjaSPUAamxcbFljXuUWE/edit?usp=sharing). At the moment categories are: docs, code, transaction tracibility. Potential categories: cross-chain assesment, cross-services assesment (Layer-1 vs Mixers).
|
|
|
|
The next big thing: have an assesment by the tech side of the privacy teams.
|
|
|
|
**16, feb, spaceship Earth**
|
|
Had a call with Ethereum Foundation. They would love to understand if non-biased/objective scoring model is possible & at which stage.
|
|
This is a challenging issue because if players didn't make one within years of privacy services existence & their general competitive attitude - this could take ages to accomplish.
|
|
|
|
- [Fileverse](https://twitter.com/miroyato/status/1626222748707225602)
|
|
|
|
**15 feb, spaceship Earth**
|
|
|
|
Continue to collect privacy-services tips how non-techies could be ensured that they use private tech
|
|
- [Lava](https://twitter.com/lavanetxyz/status/1625781267110264832)
|
|
- [Holonym](https://twitter.com/NanakNihal/status/1625655312832135168)
|
|
- [Spinner Cash](https://twitter.com/spnrapp/status/1625666410612506625)
|
|
- [Session](https://twitter.com/session_app/status/1625712450875326465)
|
|
- [ZKBob](https://twitter.com/koal_/status/1625752877095436288)
|
|
- [Litentry](https://twitter.com/KariSays_wen/status/1625861241536413696)
|
|
- [BrightID](https://twitter.com/bitsikka/status/1625853432925130753)
|
|
- [Swarm](https://twitter.com/ethswarm/status/1625836528499818497)
|
|
- [Railgun](https://twitter.com/tsu_kareta/status/1625864200504442882)
|
|
- [Penumbra](https://discord.com/channels/824484045370818580/824484046335246348/1075421328317874176)
|
|
|
|
**13-14 feb, spaceship Earth**
|
|
I decided to ask private projects & their core team publicly how to measure whenever their solutions are private. Important note: it should work for non-techies.
|
|
|
|
Opinions are great for future scoring building:
|
|
|
|
- [SCBuergel.eth from HOPR](https://twitter.com/SCBuergel/status/1625424568314654723)
|
|
- [Privacy & Scaling explorations](https://discord.com/channels/943612659163602974/956556086767403038/1075178542465306644)
|
|
- [Waku](https://twitter.com/waku_org/status/1625276654624075778)
|
|
- [Lefteris Karapetsas](https://twitter.com/LefterisJP/status/1625269056365363200)
|
|
- [webb](https://twitter.com/webbprotocol/status/1625332620942008320)
|
|
- [Boring Protocol](https://twitter.com/BoringProtocol/status/1625322766462500864)
|
|
- [Lit protocol](https://twitter.com/LitProtocol/status/1625322308821811203)
|
|
- [Alter community](https://twitter.com/AnewbiZ007/status/1625278499606106112)
|
|
- [Sons of crypto](https://twitter.com/web3d3v/status/1625476576811839496)
|
|
- [Orbis community](https://twitter.com/BaptisteGreve/status/1625475768946946049)
|
|
- [Nighthawk Wallet](https://twitter.com/aiyadt/status/1625484422936989697)
|
|
- [KILT protocol](https://twitter.com/ingoruebe/status/1625500194816266240)
|
|
- [Onion club](https://twitter.com/onionclub_io/status/1625501848189939719)
|
|
- [Sismo](https://twitter.com/dhadrien_/status/1625488518696022019)
|
|
- [Krebit](https://twitter.com/KrebitID/status/1625508542391234565)
|
|
- [Puma browser](https://twitter.com/PumaBrowser/status/1625506944613249029)
|
|
- [hideyourcash](https://twitter.com/hideyourcash/status/1625509914805239808)
|
|
- [EdenBlockVC](https://twitter.com/cleanunicorn/status/1625513229152665600)
|
|
- [Elusiv](https://twitter.com/elusivprivacy/status/1625517643481374721)
|
|
- [Beam](https://twitter.com/maxnflaxl/status/1625518069769543683)
|
|
- [Railgun](https://twitter.com/therealjmj/status/1625581000829853734)
|
|
- [Findora](https://twitter.com/PaganD/status/1625618088640274432)
|
|
- [Leo wallet](https://twitter.com/theLeoWallet/status/1625620029076291585)
|
|
- [Scala](https://twitter.com/ScalaHQ/status/1625554059821256714)
|
|
- [Media Foundation](https://twitter.com/Media_FDN/status/1625558638608715800)
|
|
- [Aleo community](https://discord.com/channels/700454073459015690/700465638937722951/1075174751510732870)
|
|
- [Automata community](https://discord.com/channels/812990347114315786/812990347114315789/1075175812875161611)
|
|
|
|
**10 feb, spaceship Earth**
|
|
|
|
Had a call with Nick Havrilyak (experienced product manager). We discussed different approaches to scoring modelling, on-chain & off-chain data management, indexing protocols etc.
|
|
|
|
**Few observations**
|
|
- lots of privacy scoring directions are highly subjective (like "if a team is ideological") & can't be automated in the DB
|
|
- The scoring model MVP would be oversimplified.
|
|
- Because the ultimate goal -> on-chain reputation x privacy services (where Unirep Protocol & co are headed)
|
|
- But there should be a point on a roadmap to receive non-expert opinions from the people who would use privacy services. I think there will be interesting insights into how they would approach assessment & "trust" (especially within non-web3 people).
|
|
|
|
**To do**
|
|
- apply a "subjective/objective" lens to Expert recommendations
|
|
- use "on-chain/off-chain" lens to recommendations
|
|
- analyze "objective" cohort
|
|
- analyze "on-chain" cohort
|
|
- create a simplified MVP vision (easy to deliver & scale further to more complex model)
|