48 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
48 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
Phases
|
|
1: Existing web3/crypto privacy narration research.
|
|
2: Handbook for web3 privacy advocacy.
|
|
|
|
Phase 1
|
|
Delivery: research on industry narration around privacy from media coverage to professional opinions.
|
|
|
|
Goal:
|
|
- to map down privacy storytelling within the industry
|
|
- to cover privacy narration & web3/crypto within external agents
|
|
- structure framing, biases, vocabulary - make a foundation for a re-framing
|
|
|
|
Areas of interest:
|
|
internal gaze
|
|
1. How media frame privacy.
|
|
2. Differences within expert takes on privacy.
|
|
3. Existing privacy-centric vocabulary.
|
|
4. Privacy advocates comms directions.
|
|
|
|
external gaze
|
|
1. How media & governments frame privacy.
|
|
2. What privacy biases exists.
|
|
|
|
Approach
|
|
Traditional media studies approach that researches both quantitative & qualitative narrations around subject.
|
|
|
|
Categorised within
|
|
- positive, negative, neutral framing filters (tonality)
|
|
- vocabulary segmentation
|
|
- relations within framing (Tornado Cash + North Korean hackers)
|
|
- quantitative statistics
|
|
- privacy agents map (roles, relation to industry, pro / anti status)
|
|
- text-based, visual content
|
|
|
|
Phase 2
|
|
Delivery: actionable handbook for privacy advocacy.
|
|
|
|
Details: research will help to make actionable handbook for privacy advocacy rooted in re-framing existing toxic storytelling. Moreover, it will give instruction & positive narrations to sceptics (like Aztec co-founder stating that people don't need privacy). Think of this as a "privacy brandbook".
|
|
|
|
Goal:
|
|
- have a easy to execute document for various audiences to become privacy advocates
|
|
- fact & stats accuracy helps to unify storytelling within multiple agents: media, experts, community
|
|
- helps to raise awareness about state of privacy storytelling within industry & beyond
|
|
|
|
Format:
|
|
- GitHub wiki
|
|
- PDF
|