70 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
70 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
<pre>
|
|
W3P: 2
|
|
Title: Media studies: privacy narration
|
|
Status: pending
|
|
Type: Research
|
|
Created: 2023-03-01
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
Background: privacy-centric narrations around web3 are full of controversies & biases generated not just by anti-privacy people but privacy experts. It impacts privacy storytelling that's still related to crime &/or "nothing to hide" communication. At the same time, the market lacks deeper research on privacy narrations & a system breakdown of all existing stereotypes & biases.
|
|
|
|
==Phases==
|
|
* Existing web3/crypto privacy narration research.
|
|
* Handbook for web3 privacy advocacy.
|
|
|
|
==Phase 1: Existing web3/crypto privacy narration research==
|
|
Delivery: research on industry narration around privacy from media coverage to professional opinions.
|
|
|
|
=Goal=
|
|
* to map down privacy storytelling within the industry
|
|
* to cover privacy narration & web3/crypto within external agents
|
|
* structure framing, biases, vocabulary - make a foundation for a re-framing
|
|
|
|
=Areas of interest=
|
|
|
|
=internal gaze=
|
|
* How media frame privacy.
|
|
* Differences within expert takes on privacy.
|
|
* Existing privacy-centric vocabulary.
|
|
* Privacy advocates comms directions.
|
|
|
|
=external gaze=
|
|
* How media & governments frame privacy.
|
|
* What privacy biases exist.
|
|
|
|
**Approach**
|
|
Traditional media studies approach that researches both quantitative & qualitative narrations around subject.
|
|
|
|
=Categorised=
|
|
* positive, negative, neutral framing filters (tonality)
|
|
* vocabulary segmentation
|
|
* relations within framing (Tornado Cash + North Korean hackers)
|
|
* quantitative statistics
|
|
* privacy agents map (roles, relation to industry, pro / anti status)
|
|
* text-based, visual content
|
|
|
|
References:
|
|
* COVID media studies: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-021-00900-z
|
|
* https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19644-6
|
|
|
|
Note: these are academic approach, that isn't necessary needed here in its full form.
|
|
|
|
==Phase 2: Handbook for web3 privacy advocacy==
|
|
Delivery: an actionable handbook for privacy advocacy.
|
|
|
|
=Details=
|
|
Research will help to make an actionable handbook for privacy advocacy rooted in re-framing existing toxic storytelling. Moreover, it will give instruction & positive narrations to sceptics (like Aztec co-founder stating that people don't need privacy). Think of this as a "privacy brandbook".
|
|
|
|
=Goal=
|
|
* have a easy to execute document for various audiences to become privacy advocates
|
|
* fact & stats accuracy helps to unify storytelling within multiple agents: media, experts, community
|
|
* helps to raise awareness about state of privacy storytelling within industry & beyond
|
|
|
|
=Format=
|
|
* GitHub wiki
|
|
* PDF
|
|
|
|
References:
|
|
* Conversation toolkits for activists: https://www.amnestyusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/DeadlyForceConversationToolkit.pdf
|
|
* https://www.ala.org/tools/sites/ala.org.tools/files/content/LTC_ConvoGuide_final_062414.pdf
|